Claim · model-written summary
Genome-wide sequences did not support the SGR allele division.
- Taxon
- Pisum fulvum
Lathyrus fulvust0 - Outcome
- divisione0
- Comparator
- sequences distributed across the entire genomee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This division was not supported by results of previous studies that were based on sequences distributed across the entire genome”
t0“Pisum fulvum”
Title
N. F. Weeden; M. Lavin; S. Abbo; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1233280
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation The SGR fragment yielded 57 alleles among 82 Pisum fulvum accessions.
- Observation Paired synonymous accessions shared SGR sequences but differed slightly in morphology.
- Method / resource SGR sequence was a more reliable indicator of accession identity than morphology.
- Observation SGR sequence separated Pisum fulvum accessions into two allele groups.
- Observation PI 595941 had an SGR sequence outside typical Pisum fulvum variation.
- Association The PI 595941 allele resembled alleles of Middle Eastern Pisum sativum landraces, suggesting ancestral hybridization.
- Observation Northern accessions were almost uniformly fixed for group A alleles.
- Association Northern accessions had greatly reduced SGR diversity compared with other group A accessions.
- Observation Group B accessions occurred from Lake Tiberias south, generally alongside southern group A accessions.
- Association Group B had greater SGR sequence diversity than group A, with 28 alleles in 33 accessions.