Claim · model-written summary
No optimum cane density was found for any trellising system.
- Taxon
- Red Raspberry
_Rubus_idaeus_-_Feuillage.jpg?width=60)
Rubus idaeust0 - Outcome
- optimum cane densitye1
- Qualifier
- not found for any systeme1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Rubus_idaeus_-_Feuillage.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Red Raspberry”
e1“While an optimum cane density was not found for any system”
Title
Trellising System and Cane Density Affect Yield and Fruit Quality of Red Raspberry
Justine E. Vanden Heuvel; John T.A. Proctor; J. Alan Sullivan HortScience 2000. doi:10.21273/hortsci.35.7.1215
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Trellising and cane density treatments significantly affected yield and yield components of raspberry.
- Intervention effect In the second season, V-trellis plants yielded more than hedgerow plants.
- Intervention effect Shift-trellis plants had the lowest yield because of a smaller fruiting framework.
- Intervention effect Fruit quality was lower on the shift-trellis than in the other two systems.
- Mechanism Differences among trellising systems were related to light penetration into the canopies.
- Intervention effect The maximum cane density (30 canes/m2) produced the highest yields.
- Association Yield potential per cane decreased as cane density increased.
- Association Total yield per unit area increased with cane density because more canes compensated for the lower yield per cane.
- Association Fruit quality decreased as cane density increased.
- Association Cane density did not affect canopy microclimate.