Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Waste heat for greenhouse heating in Switzerland reduces the carbon footprint of tomatoes to less than one-third of that under natural-gas heating (0.6 CO2-eq/kg).

A claim from Is ‘local food’ best? Evaluating agricultural greenhouses in Switzerland as an alternative to imports for reducing carbon footprint · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Waste heat for greenhouse heating in Switzerland reduces the carbon footprint of tomatoes to less than one-third of that under natural-gas heating (0.6 CO2-eq/kg).

Treatment
waste heat for greenhouse heatinge1
Outcome
carbon footprinte1
Direction
reducee1
Value
0.6 CO 2 -eq/kge1
Qualifier
less than one-thirde1
Comparator
local natural-gas-based heating systemse1
Setting
Switzerlande1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“using waste heat for greenhouse heating in Switzerland can reduce the carbon footprint to less than one-third (e.g., 0.6 CO 2 -eq/kg for tomatoes) compared to local natural-gas-based heating systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–974

Title

Is ‘local food’ best? Evaluating agricultural greenhouses in Switzerland as an alternative to imports for reducing carbon footprint

Vanessa Burg; Hamidreza Solgi; Farzaneh Rezaei; et al. Resources Environment and Sustainability 2025. doi:10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100209

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-af3e69dcbb8f8be942c125225114147921545563ed77ae5ee2d05533013e43b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

heat · environment: emissions · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cultivation system · environment: emissions · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.