Claim · model-written summary
Bt2 and L2 had 97% coding-region homology.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A 97% homology was observed between Bt2 and L2 in their coding region, but homology was poor in the 3' noncoding border.”
t0“Zea mays L.”
Title
J. L. Prioul; E. Jeannette; A. Reyss; et al. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1994. doi:10.1104/pp.104.1.179
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Maize grain enzyme activity and starch accumulation rate coincided for two years from pollination to maturity outdoors.
- Association The adjacent maize leaf showed no corresponding correlation between enzyme activity and starch accumulation.
- Observation Maize leaves showed large year-to-year differences in starch accumulation pattern.
- Mechanism Parallel changes in Bt2 and Sh2 protein content explained maize grain enzyme activity variation.
- Mechanism Bt2 and Sh2 mRNA changes preceded similar peptide changes in maize grain, suggesting transcriptional control.
- Observation Protein-content control of maize leaf enzyme activity was less obvious than in grain.
- Observation Changes in maize leaf enzyme specific activity were suggested in the first 20 days after pollination.
- Observation A maize leaf clone L2 homologous to Bt2 was isolated and represented one-third of the mature peptide.
- Observation Bt2 and L2 had poor homology at the 3′ noncoding border.
- Mechanism Bt2 and L2 arise from distinct maize genes with tissue-specific expression, explaining leaf–grain peptide and mRNA size differences.