Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PPFM inoculation increased cotton seedling vigor and dry matter production.

A claim from Combined inoculation effect of pink pigmented facultative Methylobacterium (PPFM) and other bioinoculants on cotton · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPFM inoculation increased cotton seedling vigor and dry matter production.

Treatment
PPFM inoculatione0
Interactor
PPFMe0symbiont
Outcome
seedling vigor, drymatter productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PPFM inoculation has resulted in increased seedling vigor, drymatter production and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–868
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115

Title

Combined inoculation effect of pink pigmented facultative Methylobacterium (PPFM) and other bioinoculants on cotton

P Raja; Sp Sundaram 2006. doi:10.13140/2.1.4658.8808

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-b0276a6767a02c074b0648e5c1c39b978f17b8576296a0009f6b3faab79ef6a4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 46 positive, 4 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Inoculated cotton had a 27% reduction in number of bolls per plant.

    Effect of Cotton Seedling Infection by Cotton-leaf Crumple Virus on Subsequent Growth and Yield · 1986

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Inoculated cotton had a 82% decrease in yield/plant.

    Effect of Cotton Leaf Mosaic Disease on Morphology, Yield and Fibre Characteristics of Upland Cotton in Pakistan · 2005

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    With seed inoculation with N-fixing bacteria, seed cotton yield per feddan was not significantly reduced when the mineral N rate was lowered to 45 kg N/feddan.

    EFFICIENCY OF SEED INOCULATION WITH N-FIXING BACTERIA IN DECREASING THE MINERAL N REQUIREMENTS FOR EARLY AND LATE SOWN COTTON PLANTINGS · 2004

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Reduced fertilizer dose with biofertilizer gave cotton yield levels at par with 100% recommended NPK.

    Evaluation of Efficacy of Azotobacter (AZOMAX) and VAM (ECOMAX-G) on Cotton Yield Attributing Characters · 2020 · compared with 100% recommended dose

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    AMF inoculation increased cotton yield by 28.54% against non inoculated controls.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhanced the growth, yield, fiber quality and phosphorus regulation in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) · 2020 · compared with non inoculated controls

    Same direction

  6. positive
    PGPR inoculation of cotton at 50 g per kg seed significantly increased seed cotton yield by 21% over controls.

    Response of cotton to plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation under different levels of nitrogen · 2007 · compared with their respective controls

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Microbial inoculants increased cotton yield by 3 to 23% compared with uninoculated controls.

    Microbial Inoculants with Multifaceted Traits Suppress Rhizoctonia Populations and Promote Plant Growth in Cotton · 2016 · compared with uninoculated controls

    Same direction

  8. positive
    HT 57 inoculant was identified as significant for boll number and boll weight per plant in cotton.

    Impact of the use of biofertilizers on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) crop under irrigated agro-ecosystem · 2005

    Same direction

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.