Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Neonicotinoid seed or foliar treatments effectively managed Amrasca biguttula biguttula.

A claim from Efficacy of Neonicotinoids against Okra Insect Pests · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neonicotinoid seed or foliar treatments effectively managed Amrasca biguttula biguttula.

Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid (3.0 or 5.4 g ai kg−1 seed)e0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae0pest
Outcome
Amrasca biguttula biguttula populatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all those treatments that have neo-nicotinoids viz. as seed treatment with imidacloprid (3.0 or 5.4 g ai kg−1 seed) or follar spray of thiacloprid @ 20 g gi ha−1 or thiamethoxam @ 25 g ai ha−1 at 50 5ays of sowing were found effective in managing Amrasca biguttula biguttula population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–422
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39

Title

Efficacy of Neonicotinoids against Okra Insect Pests

Sinha; Ravendra K. Sharma Pesticide Research Journal 2007

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b39c76bb02caaf2e9037677943335331f02ae6f84c6892e05e08bb74d7ceabd9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

imidacloprid · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.