Claim · model-written summary
None of the other cotton yield components differed among the rotation systems.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume5 - Outcome
- other cotton yield componentse5
- Qualifier
- among the rotation systemse5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“None of the other cotton yield components were different among the rotation systems”
Title
William T. Pettigrew; W. R. Meredith; H. Arnold Bruns; et al. The journal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science 2006
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Cotton grown after 1 yr of corn was 10% taller than continuous cotton.
- Intervention effect Cotton grown after 2 yr of corn was 13% taller than continuous cotton.
- Intervention effect Cotton grown following 2 yr of corn yielded 13% more lint than continuously grown cotton.
- Intervention effect Cotton grown following 2 yr of corn had 13% more bolls per unit ground area than continuously grown cotton.
- Intervention effect Micronaire of continuously grown cotton fiber was 1% greater than fiber from cotton following 1 yr of corn.
- Intervention effect Micronaire of continuously grown cotton fiber was 3% greater than fiber from cotton following 2 yr of corn.
- Recommendation The minimal yield increase from corn rotation would probably not justify a change in cotton production systems.
- Recommendation Other economic factors or pest problems might be important enough to justify a switch to the corn rotation.