Claim · model-written summary
At 0.02 m resolution, MAE was 2.82 g m−2.
- Taxon
- Winter Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- MAEe0
- Value
- 2.82 g m−2e0
- Qualifier
- 0.02 me0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a R2, a RMSE, a MAE and a RPD of 0.84, 4.57 g m−2, 2.50 g m−2 and 2.34 (0.01 m spatial resolution image), 0.86, 4.15 g m−2, 2.82 g m−2 and 2.65 (0.02 m)”
t0“Winter Wheat”
Title
Yan Guo; Jia He; Jingyi Huang; et al. Drones 2022. doi:10.3390/drones6100299
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Method / resource At 0.01 m resolution, nitrogen prediction R2 was 0.84.
- Method / resource At 0.01 m resolution, RMSE was 4.57 g m−2.
- Method / resource At 0.01 m resolution, MAE was 2.50 g m−2.
- Method / resource At 0.01 m resolution, RPD was 2.34.
- Method / resource At 0.02 m resolution, R2 was 0.86.
- Method / resource At 0.02 m resolution, RMSE was 4.15 g m−2.
- Method / resource At 0.02 m resolution, RPD was 2.65.
- Method / resource At 0.05 m resolution, R2 was 0.92.
- Method / resource At 0.05 m resolution, RMSE was 3.17 g m−2.
- Method / resource At 0.05 m resolution, MAE was 2.45 g m−2.
- Method / resource At 0.05 m resolution, RPD was 2.86.
- Method / resource Upscaling the 0.01 m model to 0.02 m images gave R2 0.84.
- Method / resource Upscaling the 0.01 m model to 0.05 m images gave R2 0.89.
- Method / resource Downscaling the 0.05 m model to 0.01 m images gave R2 0.86.
- Method / resource Downscaling the 0.05 m model to 0.02 m images gave R2 0.83.
- Method / resource Spatial resolution affected texture features more than spectral features.
- Association Resolution effects on performance and transferability decreased as irrigated plant wetness increased.
- Method / resource All tested resolutions achieved good winter wheat nitrogen prediction and transferability.