Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Long photoperiods slowed okra floral bud initiation and development.

A claim from Responses of Okra (Hibiscus esculentus L.) to Photoperiod and Temperature · 1973

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long photoperiods slowed okra floral bud initiation and development.

Treatment
long photoperiodse0
Outcome
initiation and developmente0
Direction
slowe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“initiation and development were slow in long photoperiods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–446
t0

“Okra (Hibiscus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–42

Title

Responses of Okra (Hibiscus esculentus L.) to Photoperiod and Temperature

T. ARULRAJAH; D. P. ORMROD Annals of Botany 1973. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084695

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ba3d400a2f54f92b53701819213e024c4aff3389299314b5b216541cb5dd8d99 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

light · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.