Claim · model-written summary
Rice grain yield was not significantly different between CBPy and the weed-free treatment in either year.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- CBPye1
- Outcome
- Rice grain yielde1
- Direction
- not significantly differente1
- Comparator
- weed-free treatmente1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mechanically transplanted rice”
e1“Rice grain yield was not significantly different between CBPy and the weed-free treatment in either year”
Title
Zichang Zhang; Hongchun Wang; Tao Gu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1281931
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Herbicide treatments did not cause visual phytotoxicity to rice.
- Intervention effect Only the two propyrisulfuron treatments had temporary negative effects on rice height, and rice recovered quickly.
- Intervention effect Compared with the weed-free treatment, CBPy did not affect rice tiller number or dry matter accumulation.
- Intervention effect Compared with the nontreated weedy check, herbicide treatments reduced total weed density by 29.4% to 99.1%.
- Intervention effect Compared with the nontreated weedy check, herbicide treatments reduced weed dry biomass by 32.2% to 98.7%.
- Intervention effect The CBPy treatment reduced weed density by 96.7% in 2021.
- Intervention effect The CBPy treatment reduced weed biomass by 95.9% in 2021.
- Intervention effect The CBPy treatment reduced weed density by 97.4% in 2022.
- Intervention effect The CBPy treatment reduced weed biomass by 95.6% in 2022.
- Intervention effect CBPy provided the highest net profit, followed by 2PrBe+PeCBBz and 2PrBe+MeCBBz, with the lowest net profit in the nontreated weedy check.
- Recommendation CBPy provides good weed control and could be promoted in mechanically transplanted rice fields in China.