Claim · model-written summary
Spore numbers of other VA mycorrhizal fungi did not change significantly with cultivation.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- cultivatione4
- Interactor
- other VA mycorrhizal fungie4symbiont
- Outcome
- Spore numbers of other VA mycorrhizal fungie4
- Direction
- did not changee4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
e4“Spore numbers of other VA mycorrhizal fungi did not change significantly with cultivation”
Title
EFFECTS OF TWO SPECIES OF V A MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI ON DROUGHT TOLERANCE OF WINTER WHEAT*
MICHAEL F. ALLEN; MICHAEL G. BOOSALIS New Phytologist 1983. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb02693.x
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Increased wheat cultivation decreased the percentage of mycorrhizal infection in wheat.
- Association Increased cultivation reduced spore numbers of Glomus fasciculatus.
- Association Mean numbers of Glomus mosseae spores increased with continued wheat production.
- Intervention effect Stomatal conductance was higher in mycorrhizal than in non-mycorrhizal wheat plants in both wet and dry treatments.
- Intervention effect Stomatal closure in mycorrhizal wheat occurred at lower leaf water potentials and after greater desiccation than in non-mycorrhizal plants.
- Observation Some leaves of Glomus mosseae-infected wheat showed no stomatal response to drought and kept transpiring at a leaf water potential as low as -4.1 MPa.
- Association Leaf osmotic adjustment was greatest in Glomus fasciculatus-infected wheat.
- Intervention effect Non-mycorrhizal and Glomus fasciculatus-infected wheat had equal dry weights in both wet and dry conditions.
- Intervention effect Infection by Glomus fasciculatus appeared to increase wheat drought tolerance.
- Intervention effect Infection by Glomus mosseae did not increase wheat drought tolerance.