Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Deep tillage system produced straw yield of 8549 kg ha−1 in spring maize.

A claim from Compost and Nitrogen Management Influence Productivity of Spring Maize (Zea maysL.) under Deep and Conventional Tillage Systems in Semi-arid Regions · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage system produced straw yield of 8549 kg ha−1 in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Deep tillage systeme0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
8549 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage system produced more grains ear−1 (365), thousand-grain weight (233.3 g), grain yield (2630 kg ha−1), straw yield (8549 kg ha−1), and shelling percentage (79.6 percent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1468
t0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–149

Title

Compost and Nitrogen Management Influence Productivity of Spring Maize (Zea maysL.) under Deep and Conventional Tillage Systems in Semi-arid Regions

Amanullah; Imran Khan; Amanullah Jan; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2015. doi:10.1080/00103624.2015.1043462

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-bac0a2fe632263a3a5405f5b941a5698579b75312f0442c3fd9d7f99a8d7630e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.