Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping cassava with cowpea reduced cassava yield by 37%.

A claim from Identification of suitable legumes in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)-Legumes intercropping · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping cassava with cowpea reduced cassava yield by 37%.

Material
cassava (cultivar Kelo)e1
Treatment
cowpeae2
Outcome
cassava yielde2
Direction
reducese2
Value
37e2
Setting
Mekiredi (Amaro research site)e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted at Mekiredi (Amaro research site) in southern nation’s nationalities and peoples region of Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130
e1

“using cassava (cultivar Kelo) and 4 legume varieties including haricot bean (omo95), mung bean (boroda-1), soybean (Awassa-95), and cow pea (Maze)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–459
e2

“Intercropping cassava with haricot bean, cowpea, soybean and mung bean, reduces cassava yield by 27, 37, 52 and 50% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–589

Title

Identification of suitable legumes in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)-Legumes intercropping

Legese Hidoto; Gobeze Loha African Journal of Agricultural Research 2013. doi:10.5897/ajar12.1976

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-bb285a25915d48e4d59878b0b9ba602c890bf30479ca5a46f6e1520d50574f3e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
    Cowpea weed management gave net returns of N2843 ha −1.

    Integrated weed management for cassava intercropped with maize · 1986 · compared with control that received two hand‐hoeings

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.