Observationmodel-written summary

The GN–AGW trade-off was not due to limited resources or more small grains.

A claim from Physiological bases of wheat grain weight response to heat waves: Post-anthesis sensitivity and responses to source-sink manipulations in contrasting cultivars · 2026

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GN–AGW trade-off was not due to limited resources or more small grains.

Outcome
GN–AGW trade-offe1
Qualifier
not due to limited resources or more small grainse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–28
e1

“The GN–AGW trade-off was not due to limited resources or more small grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2793–2867

Title

Physiological bases of wheat grain weight response to heat waves: Post-anthesis sensitivity and responses to source-sink manipulations in contrasting cultivars

Jinwook Kim; Breno Bicego; Gustavo A. Slafer; et al. Field Crops Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110310

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-bb9ccec82b31da8445a0e39877ceec949512865b8393918a64b95a38cd53bb28 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer