Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Application of 125% RDF produced significantly higher total baby corn yield without husk (2.15 tonnes/ha).

A claim from Effect of balanced fertilization on production, quality, energy use efficiency of baby corn (Zea mays) and soil health · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 125% RDF produced significantly higher total baby corn yield without husk (2.15 tonnes/ha).

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
125% RDFe1
Outcome
total baby corn yield without huske1
Direction
highere1
Value
2.15 tonnes/hae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“baby corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102
e1

“application of 125% RDF (187.5, 93.75, 75.0 kg NPK/ha) produced significantly higher yields of total baby cob yield with husk (9.55 tonnes/ha) and total baby corn yield without husk (2.15 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–483

Title

Effect of balanced fertilization on production, quality, energy use efficiency of baby corn (Zea mays) and soil health

RAKESH KUMAR; J S BOHRA; NARENDRA KUMAWAT; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2018. doi:10.56093/ijas.v88i1.79547

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-bc629c6c6f0ebee2f968d4bdd5a17dce35d534bc45be3aeb47d48cbdc0f8a65f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.