Claim · model-written summary
A. indica had no recorded borer attack.
- Taxon
- A. indica
.jpg?width=60)
Azadirachta indicae0 - Interactor
- borere0pest
- Outcome
- borer attacke0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica.”
Title
Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana
Issah Mohammed; Daniel Dompreh; Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi; et al. Trees Forests and People 2022. doi:10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Observation B. buonopozense bark regeneration was 29.4% in MSD.
- Observation B. buonopozense bark regeneration was 21.4% in GS.
- Observation M. indica bark regeneration was 22.3% in MSD.
- Observation M. indica bark regeneration was 16.1% in GS.
- Observation A. indica bark regeneration was 13.5% in MSD.
- Observation A. indica bark regeneration was 12.8% in GS.
- Observation B. sapida bark regeneration was 3.8% in MSD.
- Observation B. sapida bark regeneration was 3.7% in GS.
- Observation B. buonopozense stress shoot growth was 4.7% in MSD.
- Observation B. buonopozense stress shoot growth was 25% in GS.
- Observation No studied tree died during the study.
- Observation Wood borer attack occurred in the studied species except A. indica.
- Recommendation Authors recommend minimum harvesting for B. sapida.
- Recommendation Authors recommend rotation period for repeated harvest for B. buonopozense.
- Recommendation Authors recommend rotation period for repeated harvest for M. indica.
- Recommendation Authors recommend examination of B. buonopozense coppicing ability.