Claim · model-written summary
Oat yields were lower than those of forage sorghum or winter triticale, averaging 2,100 lb/a across years.
- Taxon
- Oat
Avena sativae4 - Outcome
- yieldse4
- Direction
- lowere4
- Value
- 2,100 lb/ae4
- Comparator
- forage sorghum or winter triticalee4
- Setting
- Southwest Research-Extension Center near Garden City, KSe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was initiated in 2012 at the Southwest Research-Extension Center near Garden City, KS, comparing several 1-, 3-, and 4-year forage rotations with no-tillage and minimum-tillage”
e4“Oat yields were lower than forage sorghum or winter triticale, averaging 2,100 lb/a across years”
Title
Determining Profitable Forage Rotations
J. Holman; A. Obour; A. Schlegel; et al. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 2019. doi:10.4148/2378-5977.7806
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Intervention effect Tillage increased winter triticale yield by 700 lb/a or 30% relative to no-till at Garden City, KS.
- Intervention effect Double-crop forage sorghum yielded 17% less than full-season forage sorghum at Garden City, KS.
- Intervention effect Tillage did not affect forage sorghum yields compared with no-tillage.
- Intervention effect Plant available water at planting was higher under minimum tillage (5.9 in./a) than under no-till (3.9 in./a) for winter triticale.