Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mass trapping kept cucumber beetle density in the cash crop below economic thresholds.

A claim from A Comparative Assessment of the Response of Two Species of Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to Visual and Olfactory Cues and Prospects for Mass Trapping · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mass trapping kept cucumber beetle density in the cash crop below economic thresholds.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
mass trapping systeme0
Interactor
cucumber beetlee0pest
Outcome
cucumber beetle densities in the cash crope0
Direction
belowe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mass trapping system, which kept cucumber beetle densities in the cash crop below economic thresholds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1356
t0

“Cucumber Beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75

Title

A Comparative Assessment of the Response of Two Species of Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to Visual and Olfactory Cues and Prospects for Mass Trapping

Jaime C Piñero Journal of Economic Entomology 2018. doi:10.1093/jee/toy094

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-bd3d8e62ec95bfca2907a925663bddf4c2654a6c6f4558e4b7048e8c3ae518a4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

trap barrier · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.