Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping maize and soybean was a losing proposition
- Taxon
- arhar (Cajanus cajan)
Cajanus cajane0 - Outcome
- intercropping of maize and soybeane5
- Qualifier
- losing propositione5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping studies with arhar (Cajanus cajan) var. T21 were conducted under irrigated conditions during 1972 and 1973 at the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana”
e5“The intercropping of maize and soybean proved to be a losing proposition”
Title
Intercropping Studies with Pigeon Pea
Jyoti Kaul; H. S. Sekhon; B. S. Dahiya Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The) 1975
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Intervention effect Planting one row of mash or mung between two rows of arhar increased arhar yield
- Intervention effect Intercropping with groundnut and soybean slightly reduced arhar yield
- Intervention effect Intercropping with maize reduced arhar yield by 101 per cent
- Intervention effect Intercropping arhar with the short-duration mash variety T9 gave the maximum cash returns over arhar grown alone