Claim · model-written summary
NAA decreased subsequent bud and flower size in peach.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae6 - Treatment
- NAAe6
- Outcome
- bud and flower sizee6
- Direction
- decreasede6
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“NAA decreased subsequent bud and flower size in peach”
Title
Schuyler D. Seeley; Hossein Damavandy; J. LaMar Anderson; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1992. doi:10.21273/jashs.117.2.203
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect In Johnson Elberta peach, NAA and Promalin were the most effective growth regulators for leaf retention, ranked above GA 4+7, GA 3, BA and control.
- Intervention effect GR-induced chlorophyll content in retained leaves of peach was highest with BA + GA 4+7 and lowest with NAA.
- Intervention effect Xanthophyll content of retained peach leaves was highest with NAA.
- Intervention effect Treating only half of a peach tree with NAA did not affect leaf retention on the untreated side.
- Intervention effect NAA enhanced bud hardiness in Johnson Elberta peach.
- Intervention effect NAA did not enhance bud hardiness in Redhaven peach.
- Intervention effect NAA did not enhance bud hardiness in Montmorency tart cherry.
- Intervention effect NAA increased hardening on both the foliated and defoliated sides of half-treated Johnson Elberta peach trees.
- Association Endodormancy duration of peach, as measured by GA 3 forcing of terminal leaf buds, was proportional to leaf retention.