Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Marketable yield averaged 3.3 Mg·ha-1 higher with POCU than with urea.

A claim from Evaluation of Polyolefin-coated Urea for Potato Production on a Sandy Soil · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yield averaged 3.3 Mg·ha-1 higher with POCU than with urea.

Taxon
Solanum tuberosumSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
POCUe1
Outcome
marketable yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Value
3.3e1
Comparator
ureae1
Setting
Becker, Minn.e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted on a Hubbard loamy sand (sandy, mixed, frigid Entic Hapludoll) during 1996 and 1997 at Becker, Minn., to evaluate the effect of a polyolefin-coated urea (POCU) fertilizer (Meister, Chisso Co., Japan) on yield and quality of irrigated `Russet Burbank' potatoes ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–312
e1

“Total and marketable yields averaged, respectively, 3.9 and 3.3 Mg·ha -1 higher with POCU than with urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–925

Title

Evaluation of Polyolefin-coated Urea for Potato Production on a Sandy Soil

Francis Zvomuya; Carl J. Rosen HortScience 2001. doi:10.21273/hortsci.36.6.1057

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-be63f5437883f1cee014998b4545bdea98a2498167e1db05b1ada799d4abded2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.