Claim · model-written summary
Ficus microcarpa fresh weight differed significantly between environments.
- Taxon
- Ficus microcarpa L.f.
Ficus microcarpae0 - Outcome
- fresh weight (FW)e0
- Setting
- two environmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fresh weight (FW) of Ficus microcarpa L.f., Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Linn, Ixora chinensis Lam.and Lagerstroemia speciosa (L.) Pers. in the two environments is different among each other significantly(p<0.05)”
Title
Leaf Functional Traits Study of Native Trees in Different City Environment
Yu-Dan Sun; Jin-Xiang Liu; Ping-Hui Huo Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Civil, Transportation and Environment 2016. doi:10.2991/iccte-16.2016.178
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Observation Leaf functional traits differed between environments in six native trees.
- Association Hibiscus rosa-sinensis fresh weight differed significantly between environments.
- Association Ixora chinensis fresh weight differed significantly between environments.
- Association Lagerstroemia speciosa fresh weight differed significantly between environments.
- Association Ficus virens specific leaf area was significantly higher in clean than polluted areas.
- Association Hibiscus rosa-sinensis specific leaf area was significantly higher in clean than polluted areas.
- Association Ixora chinensis specific leaf area was significantly higher in clean than polluted areas.
- Association Dracontomelon duperreanum specific leaf area was significantly higher in clean than polluted areas.
- Association Lagerstroemia speciosa specific leaf area was significantly higher in clean than polluted areas.
- Association Ficus microcarpa specific leaf area did not significantly differ between environments.
- Association Leaf mass per area correlated positively with fresh weight.
- Association Leaf mass per area correlated positively with dry weight.
- Association Leaf mass per area correlated weakly and positively with leaf area.
- Association Leaf mass per area correlated weakly and negatively with width-length ratio.
- Association Leaf mass per area correlated negatively with water content.
- Association Leaf mass per area showed no reported difference with average width.