Claim · model-written summary
Climate explained 27.26% of composition variation among matrix-derived species.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“climatic variables explaining the most variation (matrix‐derived: 27.26%; wetland: 24.42%)”
Title
Tara K. Miller; Einar Heegaard; Kristian Hassel; et al. Journal of Vegetation Science 2020. doi:10.1111/jvs.12955
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Association Climate explained 26.62% of variation in spring species composition.
- Association Water quality explained 26.14% of variation in spring species composition.
- Association Spatial variables explained 21.53% of composition variation.
- Association Altitude explained 10.93% of composition variation.
- Association Mean summer temperature explained 9.25% of composition variation.
- Association Climate explained 24.42% of composition variation among wetland species.
- Association Water quality explained 26.40% for matrix-derived species.
- Association Water quality explained 24.13% for wetland species.
- Association Spatial variables explained 24.87% for matrix-derived species.
- Association Spatial variables explained 16.27% for wetland species.
- Association Wetland species showed less variation explained by spatial variables than matrix-derived species.
- Association The authors infer spring species distribution tracking climate change may be limited by suitable high-altitude habitat.