Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation methods and levels did not influence sugar content.

A claim from Effect of method and level of irrigation on growth, yield and economics of spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation methods and levels did not influence sugar content.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
methods and levels of irrigatione0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
note0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Both methods and levels of irrigation influenced millable canes/ha but not the sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–976
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–99

Title

Effect of method and level of irrigation on growth, yield and economics of spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)

Ved Prakash Singh Indian Journal of Agronomy 2002

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-c02d567fb979b200cc3bbd903f8846317e877ddd8dfb6b08381d4440ba1079a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Sugar yield was highest under IW/CPE 1.2, without significant difference from 1.0.

    Sugarcane responses to irrigation and nitrogen in subtropical Iran · 2010 · compared with IW/CPE = 1.0 (25 irrigations)

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    In the second ratoon, irrigation raised Brix, Pol, and TRS relative to rainfed areas.

    Effects of Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Different Planting Arrangements on the Yields and Technological Quality of Sugarcane · 2014 · compared with rainfed areas

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    FIRB planting gave 16.9% higher cane and sugar yield than conventional planting.

    Effect of planting methods and irrigation schedules on cane yield, quality, economics and water productivity of spring sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) in South Western Punjab · 2001 · compared with conventional planting

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Flood irrigation gave higher sugar yield than SDI.

    Comparative study of subsurface drip irrigation and flood irrigation systems for quality and yield of sugarcane · 2010 · compared with SDI

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Increasing irrigations from 14 to 18 and 22 increased stalk height, number of millable canes/m2 and reducing sugars.

    EVALUATION OF THREE SUGARCANE VARIETIES GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT NUMBER OF IRRIGATIONS · 2013 · compared with 14

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Withholding irrigation for longer periods increased top to bottom Brix ratio, Brix and pol of sugarcane juice, highest at 50 and 60 days.

    Determining optimum period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) in Southern Ethiopia · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    With 75% intermittent irrigation the percent increases over control for plant length, cane girth, cane weight, internodes per cane, dry matter, juice extraction, sucrose content and available sugar were 28.0, 42.5, 14.6, 40.2, 54.4, 18.9, 44.9, 57.9 and 50.0%.

    Reuse of Distillery Wastewater with Designed Dose and Pattern for Sugarcane Irrigation · 2012 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Double sett planting had substantially higher cane yield, brix and commercial cane sugar than single set (parallel to furrow)

    Impact of NPK Fertilization on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) under Different Planting Methods · 2021 · compared with single set (parallel to furrow)

    Opposite direction

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.