Claim · model-written summary
Best practice management remained 6.7% more profitable if no yield gain was assumed.
- Treatment
- this treatmente0
- Outcome
- profitablee0
- Direction
- more profitablee0
- Value
- 6.7%e0
- Qualifier
- no yield improvement was assumede0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting
Verbatim
e0“even if no yield improvement was assumed this treatment would still be 6.7% more profitable.”
Title
Enhancing farm profitability by growing wheat for chapatti quality markets in Haryana, India
David Coventry; hir Singh Poswal; Ashok Yadav; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2013. doi:10.5897/ajar2013.7262
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Best practice management increased wheat grain yield by 2% over local farmer practice.
- Intervention effect Best practice management improved grain hardness by 11.4%.
- Intervention effect Best practice management improved chapatti score by 3.2%.
- Intervention effect Adding micronutrients and sulphur increased wheat grain yield by about 3%.
- Intervention effect Adding micronutrients and sulphur further improved wheat quality.
- Intervention effect Best practice management was 9% more profitable than local practice.
- Observation C-306 had a 30 to 40% yield penalty.
- Observation Using variety C-306 was the most profitable practice.
- Observation C-306 wheat fetched at least twice the minimum support price.