Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Postflowering mowing reduced lambsquarters viable seed production in 2020 by 72% to 91%.

A claim from Evaluation of crop-topping strategies to reduce common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) seed production in potato production systems · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postflowering mowing reduced lambsquarters viable seed production in 2020 by 72% to 91%.

Treatment
Mowing common lambsquarters postfloweringe0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
viable seed productione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
72% to 91%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mowing common lambsquarters postflowering decreased viable seed production (72% to 91%) in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–881
t0

“potato production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–133

Title

Evaluation of crop-topping strategies to reduce common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) seed production in potato production systems

Laura Anderson; Scott Neil White; Andrew McKenzie-Gopsill Weed Technology 2023. doi:10.1017/wet.2023.61

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-c2b24223cd751ffbd66c798401924b472439a0edc27384c0df35c4c0ac850eb5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Chenopodium album · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pruning · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.