Claim · model-written summary
The model predicted greater flame lengths for savanna fires than forest fires.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“the fire behaviour model predicted savanna fires to be faster, more intense, and with greater flame lengths, relative to forest”
Title
Fuels or microclimate? Understanding the drivers of fire feedbacks at savanna–forest boundaries
WILLIAM A. HOFFMANN; SUSAN Y. JACONIS; KRISTEN L. MCKINLEY; et al. Austral Ecology 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02324.x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Most variables showed strong gradients across savanna–forest boundaries, except total fuel load.
- Observation Savannas had higher daytime wind speed and air temperature than forests.
- Observation Savannas had lower daytime relative humidity and fuel moisture than forests.
- Observation Fuel loads were similar in savanna and forest.
- Mechanism Savanna fuel bulk density was lower, largely due to grasses.
- Observation The model predicted faster savanna fires than forest fires.
- Observation The model predicted more intense savanna fires than forest fires.
- Mechanism Sensitivity analysis attributed most fire behavior differences to low bulk density of grassy fuels, with smaller contributions from wind, moisture and fuel load.