Claim · model-written summary
Delayed applications of pendimethalin controlled Texas millet when combined with paraquat or imazapic.
- Taxon
- Peanut Productiont0
- Treatment
- Delayed applications of pendimethaline0
- Interactor
- Texas millete0weed
- Outcome
- controlled Texas millete0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Qualifier
- combined with either paraquat or imazapice0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“Delayed applications of pendimethalin controlled Texas millet and southern crabgrass when combined with either paraquat or imazapic”
t0“Peanut Production”
Title
Annual Grass Control in Strip-Tillage Peanut Production with Delayed Applications of Pendimethalin
W. Carroll Johnson; Eric P. Prostko; Benjamin G. Mullinix Weed Technology 2010. doi:10.1614/wt-08-133.1
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Pendimethalin alone did not effectively control Texas millet regardless of application time (69 to 77% control).
- Intervention effect Southern crabgrass was controlled by pendimethalin alone applied PRE (87%).
- Intervention effect Delayed applications of pendimethalin controlled southern crabgrass when combined with paraquat or imazapic.
- Intervention effect Imazapic was the preferred combination because of better efficacy on southern crabgrass than paraquat at most delayed applications.
- Intervention effect Peanut yield was improved when any herbicide combination was applied PRE compared with later applications.
- Intervention effect Pendimethalin plus imazapic effectively maximized peanut yield under interference from annual grasses across all application times.