Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero and minimum tillage increased soil water in the 0- to 60-cm layer by 9% over conventional tillage under stubble cropping.

A claim from The effects of tillage systems and crop rotations on soil water conservation, seedling establishment and crop yield · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero and minimum tillage increased soil water in the 0- to 60-cm layer by 9% over conventional tillage under stubble cropping.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ZT and MTe0
Outcome
soil water in the 0- to 60-cm soil layere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9%e0
Qualifier
Under stubble croppinge0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stubble cropping, ZT and MT increased soil water in the 0- to 60-cm soil layer by 9% and in the 0- to 120-cm soil layer by 6% over CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–986
e1

“spring wheat-spring wheat-flax-winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–693

Title

The effects of tillage systems and crop rotations on soil water conservation, seedling establishment and crop yield

G. P. Lafond; Heather Loeppky; D. A. Derksen Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1992. doi:10.4141/cjps92-011

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-c5f2eeae033dd5c661db8733772ea700681f1764412f945c4aaa5cdd2f3592fd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.