Claim · model-written summary
Downwind T. chilonis recovery exceeded upwind recovery by 40–50% at 45, 60 and 75 DAP.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Interactor
- T chilonis
Trichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- recoverye0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 40–50%e0
- Comparator
- upwinde0
- Setting
- down wind sectorse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_2b.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“40–50% more recovery was found at down wind sectors than at upwind at 45, 60 and 75 days after planting (DAP)”
t0“Sugarcane”
e1“movement of T chilonis”
Title
Integrated Management of Early Shoot Borer, Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) in Sugarcane
V. Rachappa; L. Krishna Naik Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2004
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Observation T. chilonis parasitization did not differ significantly across 1–5 m.
- Association Beyond 5 m, T. chilonis recovery decreased with distance.
- Observation At 90 DAP, downwind and upwind T. chilonis recovery did not differ.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane with coriander gave marked C. injilscatellus control.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane with coriander had the highest T chilonis activity.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane with okra had higher C. infuscatellus infestation.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane with okra had lower T chilonis activity.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane with coriander had the most millable canes, l,l3,130/ha.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane with coriander yielded 92.2 t/ha, the highest.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane with coriander had the highest cane equivalent yield, 100.5 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Sugarcane with coriander had maximum net return, Rs.63,498.
- Intervention effect Module I had significantly less C. infuscatellus incidence, 2.6 to 7.2%, than the modules that followed.
- Intervention effect Module III had the highest C. infuscatellus incidence.
- Observation Module I had the highest cost benefit ratio, 1:2.8.