Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated soil pollen was initially well preserved but was rapidly lost.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Inoculated soil pollen is well preserved, but pollen is lost rapidly”
Title
Mary Kay O’Rourke UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) 1986
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Observation Four plant taxa characterize Tucson airborne pollen.
- Observation Mountain pollen of three taxa was transported to the study area.
- Method / resource Annual pollen capture was similar between Burkard and Tauber samplers.
- Observation Atmospheric pollen varied seasonally but had low annual variability.
- Observation Spatial variability in pollen among sites was low.
- Observation Pollen concentrations varied widely among sites.
- Observation Pollen taxonomic composition remained constant among sites.
- Observation Reentrained soil pollen made up 11% of airborne pollen.
- Observation Gramineae and Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthus made up 90% of reentrained pollen.
- Observation Pollen reentrainment varied seasonally.
- Association High temperatures, low dew point, and moderate wind were associated with maximum atmospheric pollen concentrations.
- Association Winds before summer storms increased pollen concentrations.
- Observation Pollen from soils showed deterioration.
- Observation Four plant pollen taxa were commonly found in soils.
- Observation Morus pollen was rarely found in soils.
- Observation Four taxa with thick pollen walls were present in low numbers and resisted destruction.
- Observation Seasonally collected soil samples had similar pollen spectra.
- Observation Seasonal airborne pollen variability did not affect soil pollen spectra.
- Observation After one year, seven of eight inoculated pollen taxa approached background concentrations, while Solidago remained an order of magnitude higher.