Claim · model-written summary
Yield from grafted muskmelon entries did not differ from non-grafted “Aphrodite”.
- Taxon
- Muskmelon
.jpg?width=60)
Cucumis melot0 - Treatment
- grafted entriese4
- Outcome
- Yielde4
- Direction
- not differente4
- Comparator
- “Aphrodite”e4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e4“Yield from grafted entries was not different from the non-grafted “Aphrodite””
t0“Muskmelon”
Title
Elsa Sánchez; Robert Pollock; Timothy Elkner; et al. Horticulturae 2021. doi:10.3390/horticulturae7040069
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Most muskmelon cultivars did not differ in fruit yield from “Aphrodite”.
- Intervention effect “Sugar Cube” produced more melons than “Aphrodite”.
- Intervention effect “Sugar Cube” produced smaller sized melons than “Aphrodite”.
- Intervention effect The combination of soluble solids, flesh pH and titratable acidity was not as favorable for “Sugar Cube”, suggesting lower consumer preference than other cultivars.
- Intervention effect Physicochemical quality of “Aphrodite” scion on “Flexifort” rootstock was more favorable than “Aphrodite/RS841” and non-grafted “Aphrodite”.