Intervention effectmodel-written summary

YE at 80% ETc saved 20% irrigation water against YE at 100% ETc.

A claim from Improving Dry Onion Yield, Bulbs Nutrients Status, Water Productivity and Calcareous Soil Properties under Water Stress Using Bio-Stimulants · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YE at 80% ETc saved 20% irrigation water against YE at 100% ETc.

Treatment
80% ETc with YE treatmente0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savinge0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
100% ETc with YE treatmente0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing the 80% ETc with YE treatment and the 100% ETc with YE treatment, it was found that the amount of reduction in dry onion yield amounted to only 3.18% as an average for the two seasons with saving 20% of irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1240

Title

Improving Dry Onion Yield, Bulbs Nutrients Status, Water Productivity and Calcareous Soil Properties under Water Stress Using Bio-Stimulants

Mostafa Mohamed Zahran Alexandria Journal of Soil and Water Sciences/Alexandria Journal of Soil and Water Sciences 2024. doi:10.21608/ajsws.2024.303372.1017

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-c8affc9a1044fde8510bbe1e2b5d95c991b908c4080fc351d2ec990d56443b0d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

botanical · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.