Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45% SC had a benefit cost ratio of 1:8.7
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Spinosad 45% SCe0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe1
- Value
- 1:8.7e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T3 Spinosad 45% SC (1:8.7)”
t0“Tomato [Solanum lycopersicum L”
e1“T0 untreated control (1:4.9) having lowest B:C ratio”
Title
Challagurugula Kusha Biotechnology and Bioprocessing 2023. doi:10.31579/2766-2314/101
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had a benefit cost ratio of 1:10.
- Observation ½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit had a benefit cost ratio of 1:10.0
- Observation Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit had a benefit cost ratio of 1:8.1
- Observation Neem seed kernel extract 5% had a benefit cost ratio of 1:6.9
- Observation Azadirachtin 5% had a benefit cost ratio of 1:6.5
- Observation Beauvaria bassiana had a benefit cost ratio of 1:5.8
- Observation untreated control had a benefit cost ratio of 1:4.9
- Intervention effect Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC recorded fruit infestation of 8.57
- Intervention effect ½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit recorded fruit infestation of 9.60
- Intervention effect Spinosad 45% SC recorded fruit infestation of 10.66
- Intervention effect Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit recorded fruit infestation of 11.35 percent
- Observation Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC yielded 240.5 q/ha
- Observation ½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit yielded 232.5 q/ha
- Observation Spinosad yielded 200 q/ha