Claim · model-written summary
Increasing seeding rate raised loose smut infection.
- Taxon
- BARLEY
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- rate of seedinge0
- Outcome
- infectionse0
- Direction
- Highere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Higher infections were observed as the rate of seeding was increased.”
t0“BARLEY”
Title
RELATION OF LOOSE SMUT TO YIELD OF BARLEY
Wm. Semeniuk; J. G. Ross Canadian Journal of Research/Canadian journal of research 1942. doi:10.1139/cjr42c-041
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Association Barley yield and loose smut percentage were not significantly correlated in 1939.
- Association Loose smut incidence was linearly related to barley yield reduction in 1940.
- Association Each 1% increase in loose smut reduced barley yield by 0.85% at St. Paul, Minn..
- Association Each 1% increase in loose smut reduced barley yield by 1.4% at Edmonton.
- Association Each 1% increase in loose smut reduced barley yield by 1.2% at Fallis, Alta..
- Observation The three site-specific regression coefficients did not differ significantly.
- Association Loose smut did not noticeably affect barley tillering.
- Observation Comparable seed lots had similar loose smut infection at all stations.
- Observation At Edmonton, loose smut incidence was the same when expressed as smutted spikes or smutted plants.