Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea plus linseed was compatible at 3:1 and 4:1.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Interactor
- linseede0other
- Outcome
- compatible intercropping systemse0
- Qualifier
- 3:l and 4:l row proportionse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea intercropped with barley in all row proportions and with linseed in 3:l and 4:l row proportions were the compatible intercropping systems”
Title
I.P.S. AHLAWAT; B. GANGAIAH; OMPAL SlNGH Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v50i1.5053
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Intercropping with Indian mustard reduced chickpea yield.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with barley reduced chickpea yield.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with linseed reduced chickpea yield.
- Observation Indian mustard caused relatively greater chickpea yield reduction.
- Association Chickpea yield rose as chickpea row proportion increased from 2:1 to 4:1.
- Association Intercrop yield moved in the reverse direction as chickpea proportion increased.
- Observation Sole Indian mustard had highest chickpea-equivalent yield.
- Observation Chickpea plus barley at 2:1 and 3:1 showed land-equivalent ratio advantages.
- Observation Most sole intercrops and chickpea intercrops had higher income-equivalent ratio than sole chickpea, except chickpea plus linseed 4:1.
- Observation All intercrops were more competitive and aggressive than chickpea.
- Observation Chickpea plus barley was compatible at all row proportions.
- Observation Sole barley and linseed and several chickpea intercrops differed in chickpea-equivalent yield.