Claim · model-written summary
Species differences in growth dynamics tracked ecological amplitude and abundance.
- Taxon
- Chamaecyparis
Chamaecyparise1 - Outcome
- growth dynamicse0
- Setting
- ecological amplitudes and abundancese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Differences between the two species concerning their growth dynamics correlated closely with their ecological amplitudes and abundances.”
t0“gymnosperm tree species”
e1“Chamaecyparis obtusa var. formosana and Chamaecyparis formosensis”
Title
I‐LING LAI; HANNO SCHARR; ANDRES CHAVARRIA‐KRAUSER; et al. Plant Cell & Environment 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01386.x
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Observation Both species showed similar base-to-tip leaf growth gradients.
- Observation Both species had diurnal leaf-growth maxima in the evening.
- Association C. obtusa var. formosana grew faster in low light than C. formosensis.
- Association C. formosensis grew better at light intensities typical of open vegetation.
- Association C. formosensis reacted more slowly to changing light intensity.