Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined sheep manure and fertilizer produced much higher yield than manure alone or no fertilizer.

A claim from Effects of Sheep Manure Combined with Chemical Fertilizers on Maize Yield and Quality and Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Soil Inorganic Nitrogen · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined sheep manure and fertilizer produced much higher yield than manure alone or no fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
sheep manure combined with the chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
pure sheep manure and no fertilizere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of sheep manure combined with the chemical fertilizer is much higher than that of pure sheep manure and no fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1280
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–67

Title

Effects of Sheep Manure Combined with Chemical Fertilizers on Maize Yield and Quality and Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Soil Inorganic Nitrogen

Chun Yang; Wenbin Du; Lili Zhang; et al. Complexity 2021. doi:10.1155/2021/4330666

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-cabc1bc21871d8bbe4a4aac5a8502330fb14d05a78557d03868cb2039211dcd4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. no effect

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.