Method / resourcemodel-written summary

The first mold inhibition zone was 57.17 ± 0.75 mm, close to a predicted 57.26 mm.

A claim from Optimization of Antifungal Extracts from Ficus hirta Fruits Using Response Surface Methodology and Antifungal Activity Tests · 2015

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first mold inhibition zone was 57.17 ± 0.75 mm, close to a predicted 57.26 mm.

Taxon
Ficus hirtaFicus hirtae1
Outcome
experimental DIZse0
Direction
very closee0
Value
57.17 ± 0.75e0
Comparator
57.26e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus hirta
Ficus hirta · Taxonportioid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“experimental DIZs values obtained experimentally were 57.17 ± 0.75 and 39.33 ± 0.82 mm, which were very close to the values of 57.26 and 39.29 mm predicted by the model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–970
e1

“Ficus hirta (FH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–30

Title

Optimization of Antifungal Extracts from Ficus hirta Fruits Using Response Surface Methodology and Antifungal Activity Tests

Chuying Chen; Chunpeng Wan; Xuan Peng; et al. Molecules 2015. doi:10.3390/molecules201119648

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-cada69c1b5ffd707ed34f4f7d21d0b30a79e6e70cf99ac552139f7373c39e433 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer