Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The pearlmillet–potato–groundnut system had higher groundnut-equivalent yield (8.65 t/ ha) among cropping systems.

A claim from Productivity, profitability and soil sustainability of small-holding farming system through suitable cropping systems · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The pearlmillet–potato–groundnut system had higher groundnut-equivalent yield (8.65 t/ ha) among cropping systems.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]–potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)– groundnut (Arachis hypgaea L.) cropping systeme0
Outcome
groundnut-equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.65 t/ hae0
Comparator
cropping sequencese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]–potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)– groundnut (Arachis hypgaea L.) cropping system recorded significantly higher groundnut-equivalent yield (8.65 t/ ha) and same trend was observed in cropping sequences for system productivity (23.70 kg/ha/day), system profitability (` 613/ha/day) and net profit (` 223,610/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–835

Title

Productivity, profitability and soil sustainability of small-holding farming system through suitable cropping systems

L.J. DESAI; K.M. PATEL; P.K. PATEL; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2022. doi:10.59797/ija.v67i3.34

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-cb3a4e8a306d23edbb7f68b96fcfc5a90c07cd38b8cc20a3605a09529900f6d4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Solanum tuberosum · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    The two alternative Haryana sequences had productivity of 26.3 to 26.7 kg/ha/day and were better yielding than pearlmillet-wheat.

    Productivity and yield stability of crop sequences in Haryana and Punjab · 2002 · compared with existing pearlmillet-wheat sequence

    Same direction

See all 2 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Pearl millet yield was significantly increased when grown after groundnut, by 22·6%, relative to pearl millet as the preceding crop.

    Effect of Preceding Grain Legumes on Dryland Pearl Millet in NW India · 1979 · compared with instead of after pearl millet

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Pearl millet with groundnut increased average yield by 24% against the separately grown components.

    Evaluations of Alternate Cropping Systems for Alfisols of the Indian Semi-arid Tropics · 1985 · compared with both component crops grown separately

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Pearl millet spaced at 60 cm by 10 cm with groundnut in a 1:1 arrangement produced the highest yield attributes and yield.

    Spatial Arrangement in Pearl Millet-groundnut Intercropping System Influences Productivity, Competition and Economics · 2025

    Same direction

See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    pearl millet yield was 4.2% higher with nitrogen and zinc nanofertilizers plus organic practice.

    Effect of nitrogen and zinc nanofertilizer with the organic farming practices on cereal and oil seed crops · 2022

    Same direction

  2. positive
    The PM–CP–MB system under ZTR significantly increased pearl millet yield attributes and grain and stover productivity relative to other combinations.

    Zero Tillage, Residue Retention and System-Intensification with Legumes for Enhanced Pearl Millet Productivity and Mineral Biofortification · 2022 · compared with other treatment combinations

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Fallow systems yielded 13% more than continuous pearl millet.

    Cropping systems: Effects on soil quality indicators and yield of pearl millet in an arid region · 1997 · compared with continuous pearl millet

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Cotton-summer pearl millet had significantly higher equivalent yield and economic returns.

    Management of cropping systems for resource conservation · 2017

    Same direction

  5. positive
    All weed management practices significantly improved grain and dry fodder yield of pearl millet compared with the weedy check.

    Integrated weed management in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] · 2022 · compared with weedy check

    Same direction

  6. positive
    All management treatments significantly increased grain yield and 1000-grain weight in pearl millet under drought.

    Drought evading studies in pearlmillet · 1984

    Same direction

  7. positive
    All weed management practices significantly improved grain and dry fodder yield of pearl millet compared with the weed free check.

    Effect of Weed Control Measures on Weed and Yield of Pearl Millet (Pennisuteum glaucum L.) · 2024 · compared with weed free check

    Same direction

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.