Claim · model-written summary
The nanocomposites gave the best results in biometric indicators of potatoes during vegetation.
- Taxon
- potatoes
Solanum tuberosume1 - Treatment
- nanocompositese1
- Outcome
- biometric indicatorse1
- Direction
- best resultse1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“under the influence of the nanocomposites on the germination of soybean seeds (Glycine max L.) and the vegetation of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) showed the best results in terms of biometric indicators”
Title
Spartak S. Khutsishvili; Alla I. Perfileva; Tatyana V. Kon’kova; et al. Polymers 2024. doi:10.3390/polym16050716
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect The nanocomposites gave the best results in biometric indicators of germinating soybean seeds.
- Intervention effect The nanocomposite increased the mass of the potato root system by up to 19%.
- Intervention effect The nanocomposites showed a stimulating effect on the antioxidant system in potato tissues.
- Intervention effect The nanocomposites did not have a negative effect on the content of pigments in potato tissues.
- Intervention effect In co-incubation with the nanocomposite, the number of Clavibacter sepedonicus cells in suspension decreased by up to 40% compared with the control.
- Intervention effect In co-incubation with the nanocomposite, the dehydrogenase activity of Clavibacter sepedonicus cells decreased by 10%.