Claim · model-written summary
P and K did not significantly increase yield at Chitedze and Makoka.
- Taxon
- sweetpotato
_Flower.jpg?width=60)
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- Phosphorus and potassiume0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- did not significantly increasee0
- Setting
- Chitedze and Makokae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Phosphorus and potassium did not significantly increase the yields at Chitedze and Makoka”
t0“sweetpotato”
Title
Response of sweetpotato to fertilizer application in Malawi.
C. C. Moyo; N.M. Mahungu; S. Jumbo; et al. 2008
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Nitrogen did not affect tuber yield at Chitedze and Chitala.
- Intervention effect At Makoka, 30 kg N /ha increased yield by 3.1 t /ha (15.9%).
- Intervention effect At Makoka, 60 kg N /ha increased yield by 6.8 t /ha (34.9%).
- Intervention effect At Chitala, 30 kg P /ha increased yield by 3.6 t /ha (19.6%).
- Intervention effect At Chitala, 60 kg P /ha increased yield by 3.0 t /ha (16.3%).
- Intervention effect At Chitala, 50 K /ha increased yield by 8.9%.
- Intervention effect At Chitala, 100 K /ha increased yield by 16.2%.
- Recommendation Up to 60 kg N /ha was economically justified at Makoka.
- Recommendation Up to 100 kg K /ha was economically justified at Chitala.
- Recommendation More than 30 kg P /ha was not economically justified at Chitala.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer did not affect tuber dry matter except at Chitedze.
- Intervention effect At Chitedze, 30 kg P /ha significantly reduced dry matter.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer did not affect tuber eating qualities.