Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Eucalyptus water extract had 22% efficiency against potato tuber maceration.

A claim from Efficacy of plant extracts and bio-fertilizers for the control of bacterial wilt and soft rot agents in potato · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus water extract had 22% efficiency against potato tuber maceration.

Treatment
water extract of E. camaldulensis Dehnhe0
Interactor
P. carotovorumPectobacterium carotovorume1pathogen
Second interactor
P. atrosepticumPectobacterium atrosepticume1pathogen
Outcome
efficiencye0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
untreated potato tuberse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectobacterium carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectobacterium atrosepticum
Pectobacterium atrosepticum · Second interactorAmy Charkowski · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water extract of E. camaldulensis Dehnh that showed 22% of efficiency as compared to untreated potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1426
e1

“maceration symptoms on the tubers, pre-inoculated by either P. carotovorum or P. atrosepticum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1251

Title

Efficacy of plant extracts and bio-fertilizers for the control of bacterial wilt and soft rot agents in potato

Kamel M. Elhalag; Mohamed S. Al-Anany; Allam A. Megahed Journal of Plant Pathology 2025. doi:10.1007/s42161-024-01825-7

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-cbfd96a3aa3616d2af7f406ea53e814a1c10d60c057f9cf5b311213e00f85ed1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

botanical · Pectobacterium carotovorum · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.