Claim · model-written summary
T7 maintained better fruit yield than other olive cultivars.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeae0 - Material
- T7e1
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- other olive cultivarse0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared to other olive cultivars allowed them to maintain better fruit yield”
t0“OLIVE CULTIVARS (Olea europaea L.) UNDER CON-TRASTING WATER REGIMES”
t1“OLIVE CULTIVARS (Olea europaea L.) UNDER CON-TRASTING WATER REGIMES”
e1“Lower reduction in photosynthetic performance (PN, GS and TE) in the cultivar T7 compared to other olive cultivars”
Title
Majid Golmohammadi; Omid Sofalian; Mehdi Taheri; et al. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 2020. doi:10.24326/asphc.2020.3.12
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Year, drought, cultivar, and their interactions significantly affected fruit yield and measured traits.
- Intervention effect Drought reduced all measured traits in olive cultivars.
- Intervention effect Drought affected stomatal conductance by 42.80%.
- Intervention effect Drought affected net photosynthetic rate by 37.21%.
- Intervention effect Drought affected transpiration rate by 37.17%.
- Observation T7 had a lower reduction in photosynthetic performance than other olive cultivars.
- Observation Two principal components accounted for 82.04% of photosynthetic variation under optimal conditions.
- Observation Two principal components accounted for 83.27% of photosynthetic variation under drought.
- Observation T7, Roghani, and Koroneiki had better drought responses.
- Recommendation The authors proposed T7 for breeding high-yielding drought-tolerant olive cultivars.