Claim · model-written summary
Clipping did not reduce triticale grain yield or spikes per plant in the best instance.
- Taxon
- Triticale
×Triticosecalet0 - Treatment
- clippinge0
- Outcome
- grain yield nor the number of spikes per plante0
- Direction
- neithere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neither the grain yield nor the number of spikes per plant were reduced after clipping”
t0“Triticale”
Title
Triticale and other small grain cereals for forage and grain in Mediterranean conditions
C. ROYO; E. MONTESINOS; J. L. MOLINA‐CANO; et al. Grass and Forage Science 1993. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01831.x
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Spring forage removal caused small grain yield increases in lodging triticale genotypes.
- Intervention effect Spring forage removal caused small grain yield increases in lodging barley genotypes.
- Intervention effect Spring forage removal decreased grain yield by as much as 53% across the studied cereals.
- Association Spikes developed after early cutting were a key factor influencing cereal grain yield.
- Observation Complete triticale types were better for dual purpose than the substituted type.
- Observation The best triticale produced 3 t forage dry matter per hectare on average.
- Observation The best triticale produced 684 kg crude protein per hectare.
- Observation The best triticale subsequently produced 4–3 t grain per hectare.
- Intervention effect A forage cut reduced triticale plant height and lodging.
- Intervention effect Late cutting further increased days to heading in triticale.
- Intervention effect Cutting had no observed effect on days to heading in barley.