Claim · model-written summary
Restoration seeding did not affect Bromus tectorum cover or beta diversity.
- Taxon
- B. tectorum
Bromus tectorume0 - Treatment
- Restoration seedinge0
- Outcome
- B. tectorum cover nor beta diversitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Restoration seeding did not affect B. tectorum cover nor beta diversity”
Title
Erin B. Teichroew; Jane M. Mangold; Lilly Sencenbaugh; et al. Applied Vegetation Science 2026. doi:10.1111/avsc.70068
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Mustard seed meal controlled Bromus tectorum for one year.
- Intervention effect Mustard seed meal reduced plant species richness.
- Observation Bromus tectorum was highly dominant two and three years after mustard seed meal treatment.
- Intervention effect NutraFix controlled Bromus tectorum for two years.
- Intervention effect NutraFix had no meaningful impact on species richness or alpha diversity.
- Intervention effect Indaziflam controlled Bromus tectorum for three years.
- Intervention effect Indaziflam reduced plant species richness.
- Intervention effect Indaziflam shifted the plant community toward dominance by Pascopyrum smithii.
- Intervention effect Restoration seeding increased species richness and alpha diversity.