Claim · model-written summary
Chlorine injection intervals and concentrations did not significantly influence plant height, leaf area or tomato yield in either year.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- chlorine injection intervals and concentrationse2
- Outcome
- plant height, leaf area, or tomato yielde2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Qualifier
- for both yearse2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Yield and Quality and Emitter Clogging”
e2“The statistical tests indicated that neither the chlorine injection intervals and concentrations nor the interactions between the two significantly influenced plant height, leaf area, or tomato yield for both years”
Title
Li; Jiu-sheng; Yanfeng; et al. 农业科学学报：英文版 2012
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Chlorinated sewage application gave 7.5 percent lower tomato yield than non-chlorinated sewage in 2008.
- Intervention effect In 2009, tomato yield with and without chlorination was similar.
- Intervention effect Chlorination did not significantly influence ascorbic acid, soluble sugar or soluble acid quality of tomato fruit.
- Intervention effect The interaction of chlorine injection interval and concentration significantly influenced soluble solids levels in tomato fruit.
- Intervention effect Chlorination was an effective method for reducing biological clogging of emitters.
- Recommendation The authors recommend chlorination for tomato because it is safe and maintains high performance in drip systems with sewage effluent.