Claim · model-written summary
WH-711 grain yield fell 16.02% at 3×3 m relative to control.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- WH-711e0
- Treatment
- 3×3 m spacinge2
- Outcome
- graine1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 16.02e0
- Comparator
- controle1
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“WH-711 (16.02 and 17.01%)and HD-2967”
e1“reduction in grain and straw yieldover control”
e2“under 3×3 m spacing”
t0“wheat cultivars”
Title
Parvinder Kumar; Chhavi Sirohi; Sushil Kumari; et al. Annals of Horticulture 2021. doi:10.5958/0976-4623.2021.00012.8
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Poplar growth was significantly higher at 3×3 m spacing.
- Intervention effect Wheat growth and yield attributes were significantly reduced under poplar relative to sole cropping.
- Observation HD-2967 had the maximum grain yield of 4.68 t/ha in 8×3 m poplar spacing.
- Observation WH-711 yielded 4.25 t/ha under 8×3 m poplar spacing.
- Intervention effect WH-1105 grain yield fell 23.9% at 3×3 m relative to control.
- Intervention effect WH-1105 straw yield fell 18.2% at 3×3 m relative to control.
- Intervention effect WH-711 straw yield fell 17.01% at 3×3 m relative to control.
- Intervention effect HD-2967 grain yield fell 10.7% at 3×3 m relative to control.
- Intervention effect HD-2967 straw yield fell 11.69% at 3×3 m relative to control.
- Observation Straw yield declined less than grain yield across poplar spacings.
- Observation Overall grain and straw yield reductions were greater at 3×3 m spacing.