Claim · model-written summary
In that experiment, yield was not significantly affected.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- +Moe1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- not affectede0
- Comparator
- –Moe1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield was not affected significantly”
e1“with +Mo relative to –Mo”
t0“common bean”
Title
Moryb Jorge Lima da Costa Sapucay; Rogério Faria Vieira; Rogério Faria Vieira; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2016. doi:10.1080/01904167.2016.1161782
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Without Mo, leaf nitrogen concentration ranged from 35.1 to 42.5 g kg−1.
- Observation With Mo, leaf nitrogen concentration ranged from 40.3 to 49.2 g kg−1.
- Observation Without Mo, yield ranged from 1560 to 3350 kg ha−1.
- Observation With Mo, yield ranged from 2829 to 3567 kg ha−1.
- Association In two experiments without Mo, leaf nitrogen concentration or yield rose linearly or quadratically with increasing nitrogen rate.
- Association In two experiments with Mo, leaf nitrogen concentration or yield did not rise with increasing nitrogen rate.
- Association In one experiment, leaf nitrogen concentration rose linearly with nitrogen rate.
- Intervention effect In one experiment, Mo increased leaf nitrogen concentration by 16% relative to no Mo.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that Mo fertilizer can replace side-dressed N while supporting yields as high as 3000 kg ha−1.