Claim · model-written summary
Leaf anatomy did not support current infrasectional classification.
- Taxon
- DaphniphyllumDaphniphyllumt0
- Outcome
- no support for the current infrasectional classificatione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“there is no support for the current infrasectional classification of section Daphniphyllum”
t0“Daphniphyllum”
Title
Comparative morphology on leaves of Daphniphyllum (Daphniphyllaceae)
M.-S. Tang; Y.-P. Yang; C.-R. Sheue Blumea - Biodiversity Evolution and Biogeography of Plants 2009. doi:10.3767/000651909x474104
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Observation All studied species had glabrous leaves with brachyparacytic stomata.
- Observation Some taxa had hemiparacytic, laterocytic or anomocytic stomata.
- Observation Two sampled Lunata species had irregular epidermal cells and hemiparacytic stomata.
- Observation Sampled section Daphniphyllum species had varied cell walls and laterocytic or anomocytic stomata.
- Method / resource Leaf anatomy supported identification at species level.